NTEU
Working
Today for a Better Tomorrow
NTEU
Score of
Office and Region
Performance Ratings
NTEU prepared the table below to compare the percentage of Os, Es, and FSs given in the different NRC Offices and Regions to measure management's evaluation of employee performance. NTEU did this by developing a scoring system to weight the "O", "E," and "FS" performance appraisal percentages with similar point values used in the actual appraisal process. This gives a single Office-level and Region-level NTEU score.
NTEU Scoring Method
Outstanding (O) = 4 points
Excellent (E) = 3 points
Fully Successful (FS) = 2 points
NTEU's Score of Office / Region
Performance Ratings =
( %Os x 4 ) + ( %Es x 3 ) + ( %FSs x 2 )
Results
The NTEU "Score of Office / Region Performance Ratings" ranges from 2.83 to a perfect 4.0.
What does this mean?
Either 1) Employees are truly lower or higher performers in different offices and regions, or
2) Employee evaluations are not consistently administered.
Score Color Definitions
Green = 3.5
or above , Large percentage of Os
Yellow = Near 3.2, the NRC average
Red = Below 3.18, Large percentage of Es and FSs
NRC 2006 Appraisals
1963 Bargaining Unit Employees
Rank
Order
Office / Region Alphabetically Ordered or Rank Order |
%O | %E | %FS | 2006 NTEU's Score of Office / Region Performance Ratings (%O x 4) + (%E x 3) + (%FS x 2) ú or ü >0.1 pt. change |
2005 NTEU Score |
2004 NTEU Score |
2003 NTEU Score |
2002 NTEU Score |
| NRC Agency | 34 | 54 | 12 | 3.22 | 3.22 | 3.30 | 3.32 | 3.27 |
| ACRS | 75 | 25 | 0 | 3.75 | 3.67 | 3.73 | 3.75 | 3.77 |
| ADM | 35 | 58 | 7 | 3.28 | 3.21 | 3.23 | 3.29 | 3.34 |
| ASLBP | 86 | 14 | 0 | 3.86 | 3.79 | 3.60 | 4.00 | 3.56 |
| CAA | 50 | 50 | 0 | 3.50ú | 3.67 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.75 |
| CFO | 33 | 64 | 3 | 3.20 | 3.21 | 3.38 | 3.32 | 3.35 |
| EDO | No bargaining Unit Employees | 3.25 | 4.00 | 4.00 | ||||
| HR | 50 | 35 | 15 | 3.35 | 3.32 | 3.43 | 3.25 | 3.34 |
| IP | 25 | 69 | 6 | 3.19 | 3.25 | 3.53 | 3.60 | 3.50 |
| IS | 31 | 52 | 17* | 3.14 | 3.18 | 3.24 | 3.14 | 3.13 |
| NMSS | 49 | 47 | 4 | 3.45ü | 3.34 | 3.43 | 3.41 | 3.30 |
| NRR | 31 | 54 | 15* | 3.16 | 3.21 | 3.35 | 3.37 | 3.33 |
| NSIR | 28 | 62 | 10 | 3.17ú | 3.28 | 3.36 | 3.47 | 3.30 |
| OE | 45 | 55 | 0 | 3.46ü | 3.31 | 3.57 | 3.36 | 3.17 |
| OGC | 61 | 39 | 0 | 3.61ü | 3.48 | 3.44 | 3.50 | 3.47 |
| OI | 4 | 74 | 22 | 2.83 | 2.88 | 3.00 | 3.19 | 3.13 |
| PA | 100 | 0 | 0 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.67 | 3.56 |
| RES | 34 | 48 | 18* | 3.15 | 3.11 | 3.18 | 3.27 | 3.32 |
| RI | 18 | 63 | 19 | 2.98 | 3.04 | 3.11 | 3.13 | 3.09 |
| RII | 37 | 52 | 11 | 3.26 | 3.17 | 3.18 | 3.31 | 3.25 |
| RIII | 27 | 57 | 16 | 3.12 | 3.10 | 3.07 | 3.03 | 2.99 |
| RIV | 38 | 55 | 7 | 3.32 | 3.24 | 3.36 | 3.43 | 3.36 |
| SECY | 50 | 50 | 0 | 3.50ú | 3.60 | 3.67 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| STP | 44 | 56 | 0 | 3.44ú | 3.65 | 3.62 | 3.63 | 3.42 |
* FS data includes 7 employees that were rated minimally successful